Current:Home > ContactCalifornia Supreme Court to weigh pulling measure making it harder to raise taxes from ballot -Horizon Finance School
California Supreme Court to weigh pulling measure making it harder to raise taxes from ballot
View
Date:2025-04-13 10:14:05
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The California Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments Wednesday about whether to remove a measure from the November ballot that would make it harder for the state and local governments to raise taxes.
The measure would require all new and higher taxes to be approved by voters. Right now, the Legislature can raise taxes with a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and Assembly. The initiative would require statewide voters to weigh in after legislative approval, with the new tax taking effect only if a majority approve it.
The measure would also change how communities can raise taxes through citizen initiatives. Right now, a local initiative for a special tax increase requires a simple majority vote. The ballot measure would change that to a two-thirds majority.
The court battle is pitting Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who wants it off the ballot, against business groups and taxpayer advocates, who say it’s time to rein in government spending. The fight comes as Newsom faces persistent criticism that California has become too expensive for many of its 39 million residents.
A lawsuit filed last fall by Newsom, the Legislature and John Burton, a former congressman and chair of the California Democratic Party, asked the court to remove the measure from the ballot. They argued that, if approved, it would “eliminate much of the executive branch’s administrative and regulatory power and would repeal taxing authority that the Legislature has held throughout California’s history.”
They said the sweeping proposition would curtail revenue needed by local communities to run essential public services, from collecting trash to fighting fires, and make it hard to have the funds needed to respond to state emergencies like earthquakes and global pandemics.
The measure, they argued, would “make a far-reaching change in the fundamental governmental structure or the foundational power of its branches as set forth in the Constitution” and amounts to revising the California Constitution, which requires a vote by the Legislature.
But supporters of the measure say Californians face some of the highest taxes and one of the highest costs of living in the country and that the changes are needed.
“The whole issue here is that they are scared to death of the people of California being empowered to vote on state and local taxes,” said Rob Lapsley, president of the California Business Roundtable, an advocacy group that represents large companies and is a lead proponent of the initiative.
The California Supreme Court is expected to decide before June 27 — the deadline for the Secretary of State to certify California’s general election ballot — whether the measure would revise the state constitution and impair essential government functions.
The measure, which collected 1.4 million signatures to qualify for the ballot, would also reclassify many government fees as taxes and apply retroactively to any tax increase approved after Jan. 1, 2022.
Carolyn Coleman, CEO of the League of California Cities, which is part of a coalition opposing the measure, along with firefighters and teachers unions, called the measure “deceptive” and “an existential threat” to local governments.
Coleman said that over 100 local measures currently funding about $2 billion each year in municipal revenue could be gone if the measure is approved and the taxes are not reapproved by voters under the new rules.
“We’re raising the resources to fill potholes, so that we can support affordable housing in our community, so we can work to address homelessness, so that when you dial 911 there’s somebody there to answer the phone — not in two minutes — but in 30 seconds,” she added. “So, this really goes against the essential nature of how local government raises the revenues to provide services that everyone wants in their communities.”
Brooke Armour, executive vice president of the California Business Roundtable, said that assertions that the measure would cause chaos in local governments are wrong because the measure would only impact tax increases proposed through citizen initiatives. About three dozen local initiatives would be affected by the changes, not over 100, she said.
“We only revert back to two-thirds (approval) for citizen initiatives that are special taxes,” she said.
Armour said special taxes put on the ballot by local elected officials, like a city council, already require a two-thirds vote for approval. All measures raising general taxes would still be approved with a majority vote, she said.
One example of a community that could be affected if the measure is approved is San Andreas, a town of about 2,500 people and the county seat of Calaveras County. In March, 55% of county voters approved a citizen initiative to impose a 1% sales tax so the county’s 10 fire districts could have funds to retain or hire firefighters.
The San Andreas Fire Protection District relies on volunteer firefighters who get a stipend of $120 to $200 per 24-hour shift. The district keeps losing its firefighters to better-paying jobs, said Dana Nichols, chair of the San Andreas Fire Protection District.
Nichols said the tax amounts to about $60 per taxpayer per year.
“Not paying the firefighters is not going to bring down the cost of eggs or gasoline or anything,” Nichols said.
veryGood! (4156)
Related
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- Kim Kardashian Reacts to Kanye West Accusing Her of Cheating With Drake
- How Federal Giveaways to Big Coal Leave Ranchers and Taxpayers Out in the Cold
- In some states, hundreds of thousands dropped from Medicaid
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Turning Skiers Into Climate Voters with the Advocacy Potential of the NRA
- Some Utilities Want a Surcharge to Let the Sunshine In
- The Texas Legislature approves a ban on gender-affirming care for minors
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Nordstrom Rack's Clear the Rack Sale Has $5 Madewell Tops, $28 Good American Dresses & More for 80% Off
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Debris from OceanGate sub found 1,600 feet from Titanic after catastrophic implosion, U.S. Coast Guard says
- Draft Airline Emission Rules are the Latest Trump Administration Effort to Change its Climate Record
- Here's what's on the menu for Biden's state dinner with Modi
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Scientists zap sleeping humans' brains with electricity to improve their memory
- Two and a Half Men's Angus T. Jones Is Unrecognizable in Rare Public Sighting
- Supreme Court rules against Navajo Nation in legal fight over water rights
Recommendation
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
New report on Justice Samuel Alito's travel with GOP donor draws more scrutiny of Supreme Court ethics
Big City Mayors Around the World Want Green Stimulus Spending in the Aftermath of Covid-19
Can multivitamins improve memory? A new study shows 'intriguing' results
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
Homelessness rose in the U.S. after pandemic aid dried up
Wildfires Trap Thousands on Beach in Australia as Death Toll Rises
Caught Off Guard: The Southeast Struggles with Climate Change